
Email Subscription
Subscribe via RSS or Twitter
The Blogging Team
The Home Team
Claire Walker
Ross McKean
Blanca Escribano
Anna Soilleux
Carsten Kociok
Michael Spooner
Elle Todd
Matthias Vierstraete
Mel Shefford
Jill PollockThe International Team & Guest Bloggers
Erica Wiking Häger (Mannheimer Swartling)
Jeanne Kelly (Mason Hayes + Curran)
Krzysztof Wojdylo (Wardynski & Partners)
Sylwia Paszek (Wardynski & Partners)
Laura Liguori (Portolano Colella Cavallo)
Robert Nešpůrek (Havel & Holásek)
Roland Marko (Wolf Theiss)
Roxana Negutu (Voicu & Filipescu)
Saija-Leena Asikainen (Hannes Snellman Attorneys Ltd)General Resources
EU Legislation
- European Convention on Human Rights
- European Directive 95/46/EC (Data Protection and Free Movement of Data Directive)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive)
- Directive 2006/24/EC (Data Retention Directive)
- Directive 2009/136/EC (Amendment Directive)
- Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data
EU Policy and Guidance
- European Commission
- Article 29 Working Party
- European Data Protection Supervisor
- Commission Decision 2000/520/EC of 26 July 2000 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC
- The European Court of Justice
- Council of Europe
- Commission Model Clauses for controller to controller transfers [2001]
- Alternative Model Clauses for controller to controller transfers [2004]
- Model Contract Clauses for controller to processor transfers [2010]
UK Legislation
UK Policy and Guidance
Other Data Protection Sites
Cookie Resources
Cookie Legislation
Cookie Guidance
- ICC UK Cookie Guide - April 2012
- ICO cookies guidance
- UK Guidance - May 2012
- UK enforcement policy
- EASA best practice recommndation on OBA
- Article 29 WP 2010 Opinion on OBA
- Article 29 WP 2011 Opinion on "consent"
Key points from 2011 cookies event
Technical FAQs on cookies
Our Statistics
Visits today: 111
Total visits: 24938
Currently: 1 visitors online
Blog Archive
- April 2013 (1)
- March 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (5)
- January 2013 (4)
- November 2012 (2)
- October 2012 (1)
- September 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- June 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (1)
- April 2012 (1)
- March 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (1)
- January 2012 (3)
- December 2011 (4)
- November 2011 (3)
- October 2011 (1)
- July 2011 (3)
- June 2011 (2)
- May 2011 (2)
- April 2011 (3)
- March 2011 (5)
- February 2011 (5)
- January 2011 (7)
- December 2010 (1)
- November 2010 (8)
- October 2010 (10)
- September 2010 (5)
- August 2010 (1)
- July 2010 (6)
- June 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (14)
- March 2010 (13)
- February 2010 (9)
- January 2010 (11)
- December 2009 (10)
- November 2009 (17)
- October 2009 (15)
- September 2009 (9)
- August 2009 (18)
- July 2009 (20)
- June 2009 (18)
- May 2009 (16)
- April 2009 (16)
- March 2009 (20)
- February 2009 (16)
- January 2009 (25)
- December 2008 (14)
- November 2008 (11)
- October 2008 (17)
- September 2008 (10)
Hamburg in legal action against Facebook
The Hamburg Data Protection Authority has launched a legal action against Facebook accusing the social networking site of illegally accessing, saving and using the personal details of non members for marketing purposes. The action could result in Facebook being fined tens of thousands of Euros. Germany has some of the strictest and most detailed data protection laws in the world, setting out how and how much of an individual’s private information may be accessed and by whom.
This is particularly interesting for three reasons. The first being that in April this year, Facebook unveiled streamlined privacy settings making it possible for users to block access to their e-mail lists. But the head of Hamburg Data Protection Authority, Johannes Caspar, is concerned that previously saved e-mail addresses and other data gathered by Facebook have not been erased. The second is that, until now, the questions asked of Facebook have related to the quantity and use of personal data but this investigation relates to non members. They have not registered for the site and have not given permission for the site to collect and use their information. Lastly, it once again brings into the spotlight that the privacy laws in Europe are much stronger than in the US where privacy relates to protecting the consumer rather than fundamental human rights.
Facebook has until the 11 August to respond. They have made a statement saying that they are reviewing the situation and will respond within the timeframe.
Hamburg has a reputation for taking alleged privacy breaches by internet companies very seriously. It was the first to launch the ongoing investigation into Google for intercepting personal data from WiFi networks, while it was taking photographs for Street View.