
Email Subscription
Subscribe via RSS NewsFeed
The Blogging Team
The Home Team
Claire Walker
Blanca Escribano
Anna Soilleux
Carsten Kociok
Christina Motejl
Michael Spooner
Elle Todd
Matthias Vierstraete
The International Team & Guest Bloggers
Roger Hartley
Erica Wiking Häger (Mannheimer Swartling)
Iain Henderson (Mydex)
Jeanne Kelly (Mason Hayes + Curran)
Krzysztof Wojdylo (Wardynski & Partners)
Sylwia Paszek (Wardynski & Partners)
Laura Liguori (Portolano Colella Cavallo)
Robert Nešpůrek (Havel & Holásek)
Roland Marko (Wolf Theiss)
Roxana Negutu (Voicu & Filipescu)
Saija-Leena Asikainen (Hannes Snellman Attorneys Ltd)General Resources
EU Legislation
- European Convention on Human Rights
- European Directive 95/46/EC (Data Protection and Free Movement of Data Directive)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive)
- Directive 2006/24/EC (Data Retention Directive)
- Directive 2009/136/EC (Amendment Directive)
- Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data
EU Policy and Guidance
- European Commission
- Article 29 Working Party
- European Data Protection Supervisor
- Commission Decision 2000/520/EC of 26 July 2000 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC
- The European Court of Justice
- Council of Europe
- Commission Model Clauses for controller to controller transfers [2001]
- Alternative Model Clauses for controller to controller transfers [2004]
- Model Contract Clauses for controller to processor transfers [2010]
UK Legislation
UK Policy and Guidance
Other Data Protection Sites
Cookie Resources
Cookie Legislation
Cookie Guidance
- UK compliance guidance - May 2011
- UK compliance guidance - December 2011
- UK enforcement policy
- EASA best practice recommndation on OBA
- Article 29 WP 2010 Opinion on OBA
- Article 29 WP 2011 Opinion on "consent"
EU cookie implementation
Key points from cookies event
Technical FAQs on cookies
Our Statistics
Visits today: 13
Total visits: 10571
Currently: 0 visitors online
Blog Archive
- April 2012 (1)
- March 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (1)
- January 2012 (3)
- December 2011 (4)
- November 2011 (3)
- October 2011 (1)
- July 2011 (3)
- June 2011 (2)
- May 2011 (2)
- April 2011 (3)
- March 2011 (5)
- February 2011 (5)
- January 2011 (7)
- December 2010 (1)
- November 2010 (8)
- October 2010 (10)
- September 2010 (5)
- August 2010 (1)
- July 2010 (6)
- June 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (14)
- March 2010 (13)
- February 2010 (9)
- January 2010 (11)
- December 2009 (10)
- November 2009 (17)
- October 2009 (15)
- September 2009 (9)
- August 2009 (18)
- July 2009 (20)
- June 2009 (18)
- May 2009 (16)
- April 2009 (16)
- March 2009 (20)
- February 2009 (16)
- January 2009 (25)
- December 2008 (14)
- November 2008 (11)
- October 2008 (17)
- September 2008 (10)
It’s official: some initial reactions to the draft DP Regulation
So, the reports that we would not see the detail of the reforms until March proved unfounded. The official publication of the Commission’s DP reform proposals earlier today, exactly on schedule, cannot have escaped the notice of Datonomy readers. (But just in case, the link to the package of new measures is here .)
The centre of attention is the comprehensive Regulation, weighing in at 139 Recitals and 91 Articles and a total of 118 pages (if you include the memo at the front and the impact statement at the back).
The Datonomy correspondents at Olswang have been busy all afternoon analysing the practical implications of the proposal, and their initial analysis for in house counsel is now available.
The new regime will obviously have a major impact on data protection regulators too – the initial reactions of the UK’s regulator are here on the ICO’s website.
Anyone who missed Vice President Reding’s press conference at lunchtime can watch it at their leisure. Datonomy was delighted to see that the Vice President echoed the views in the recent post by Christina Motejl that the strong new rules draw inspiration from Germany.
There will be no shortage of law firm and business commentary in the media over the hours and days to come – Datonomy looks forward to hearing the views and comments of its correspondents and readers (both in house and in private practice) from around the globe, and to some lively debate as the details of the proposals are evaluated in more depth – and at greater leisure.